This article originally appeared on Live in the Now.
There’s no denying that growing old is part of life, but is our only option to simply sit by and watch as our physical vitality and mental sharpness deteriorate?
Well, research is showing that it’s possible to be very much in control of your aging process.
Several years ago, scientists were baffled by a startling discovery. Research showed that reducing the number of calories you consume daily, while maintaining proper nutrition, can actually help you live longer — by as much as 10 years!
This concept, known as “caloric restriction”, miraculously mitigates the effects of the aging process. It turns out that your body has a built-in survival mode that is activated when it is short on calories. When this happens, the aging process actually slows down. Think of it as a form of cellular hibernation.
How to Get the Benefits of Eating Less Without Eating Less
While the prospect of adding 10 years to your life is exciting, maintaining a calorie restricted lifestyle might not be your idea of “the good life.” It’s hard enough to diet for just a few months — and even harder to do it for years or decades. But what if you could trick the system?
Incredible new research has shown that resveratrol, the powerful antioxidant substance famous for giving red wine its health benefits, has the unique ability to mimic the positive effects of a low calorie diet — even for those who aren’t curbing their food intake. According to experts, supplementing your diet with resveratrol can actually slow aging and increase your lifespan. Plus, it provides a vast array of cardiovascular benefits.
The research on resveratrol’s ability to extend human life is so promising that Big Pharma has it on their radar as their next potential blockbuster drug. However, since resveratrol is a natural substance, they can’t patent it and reap enormous profits. One drug company has already spent over $700 million to create a synthetic version of resveratrol so they can sell it as a drug that costs many more times what natural resveratrol does.
Fortunately for you, you don’t have to wait for the pharmaceutical version. You can get natural resveratrol right now and start to benefit from its miraculous life-extending properties.
However, you need to make sure you take the right type of resveratrol and the correct amounts. Otherwise, you are not only wasting money but potentially missing out on an amazing opportunity to extend your lifespan and improve almost every aspect of your health.
Take a Resveratrol Supplement That Really Works
The key to getting maximum benefits is to take a supplement that most closely matches what was used in the actual research. The more I tested resveratrol supplements, the more I realized that very few actually contained the precise type and amounts of resveratrol shown to provide meaningful life extension and health benefits. Those that did were absurdly expensive.
The unfortunate side of the extraordinary, emerging research on resveratrol is how quickly a wave of junk supplements flooded the market. There was no shortage of “here today, gone tomorrow” companies trying to make a quick profit on people seeking to benefit from resveratrol. This is a shame since these poor quality supplements watered down the scientifically proven benefits, and turned a lot of people off on resveratrol in general. But junk supplements aside, the science backing the benefits of resveratrol is incredibly solid.
How to Choose the Right Resveratrol
If you want to take advantage of the incredible health benefits of resveratrol, but don’t want to waste your hard earned money on an inferior, watered-down supplement, here are five things to look for in a good product:
1. A minimum daily dosage of 300 mg of resveratrol. There is no known toxicity associated with resveratrol, so generally, the more the better. Based on my research, I’d say that 400 mg is an ideal daily dose.
2. Japanese knotweed. Resveratrol is a compound that can be extracted from many natural substances, such as grapes. However, the most concentrated source of resveratrol in the world is the Japanese knotweed plant.
3. A standardization level of at least 50%. You can be tricked by a supplement made from 1,000 mg of Japanese knotweed that’s only standardized to 20%. That means you’re only getting 200 mg of resveratrol. In general, the highest quality supplements are standardized to 50% resveratrol.
4. The trans-form. Perhaps the most important tip I can give is to choose trans-form resveratrol, which has been shown to offer maximum bioavailability and potency. If you don’t see “trans” on the label, don’t take it.
5. Synergistic ingredients. Select synergistic ingredients can really boost the benefits of resveratrol. My favorite are grape extracts and red wine extracts which seemingly work well to “boost” the anti-aging benefits of resveratrol.
I’ve spent enough years in the natural health industry to know that all the science in the world can’t help you if there’s no practical way to apply it. That’s why it’s important to choose the right resveratrol supplement — however I can’t stress the important enough of getting started, especially if you’re over the page of 45.
My Top Pick for the Best Resvertrol Supplement
The resveratrol supplement that I recommend and personally take is ResveraPLUS. I must disclose that I helped develop ResveraPLUS as a way of fighting back against all of the junk resveratrol supplements on the market. I am a true believer in the life extending potential of resveratrol, and I that thought a high quality, yet affordable resveratrol product was missing from the market.
ResveraPLUS is made with 800 mg of Japanese knotweed, which is standardized to 50% pure trans-form resveratrol, so you get a solid 400 mg daily dose of resveratrol. ResveraPLUS also features grape seed extract, whole grape extract and red wine extract, which are included because research shows that they contain compounds that provide synergistic benefits.
 Hepple RT, et al. Caloric Restriction Protects Mitochondrial Function with Aging in Skeletal and Cardiac Muscles. Rejuv Res. 2006;9(2): 219-222.